I think regulatory and market developments in the mortgage market are more important now than FOMC forecasts are. If mortgages expand, rates will rise. If they don't, rates will not rise, and if the Fed tries to raise them too much, I don't think they will be able to rise by much.
The slope of the yield curve peaked in late 2013 at about 35 basis points per quarter, and has since declined back to about 18 bp per quarter. Previous rate hike slopes during the Great Moderation have been in the 50 to 75 bp range, so this is very low. Again, I think this is highly dependent on mortgage expansion. If the Fed begins raising rates without an expansion in mortgages, the yield curve will flatten. If they begin raising rates and mortgages are expanding, then we are highly unlikely to see such a low rate of increases, no matter what the FOMC says they plan to do.
One possibility for the extremely low long term rates and slope is that, because of the zero lower bound, expectations are not normally distributed. There may be a negative skew, so that the mode expected forward rates are higher than the median. Normally the mean expected rate would be lower than the median in that case, but the zero lower bound truncates the values at the negative end of the curve, which has the opposite effect. Regarding the slope, there could be a bifurcation of expectations, divided between rates rising at something more like the past rates of 50 bp per quarter or more, and another set of investors who don't expect a rise at all.
Or, another way to look at this is that there is simply a broad disequilibrium throughout the bond market, especially in the long term market, because the collapse in the real estate market has left a hole of $20 trillion worth of US real estate that evaporated, and the combination of a hobbled mortgage market and frictions in the own-for-rental market, that prevent capital expansion in that asset class from expanding enough to capture the large amount of low risk capital in US financial markets.
Mortgage expansion will solve both of these distortions, so I expect mortgage expansion to lead to an increased slope and a higher level for long term rates. The FOMC announcement will bring some short term volatility, but rates forward enough to have a reduced exposure to the initial rate hike decision should be more exposed to mortgage developments than to transitive FOMC policy statements.
While the government continues to harass mortgage lenders, which is understandable given the consensus view that this is all their fault, mortgage originations appear to be on the rise. This seems to be showing up in the Fed's H.8 reports, and Flow of Funds looks like mortgage levels are finally ready to rise. But, this isn't a done deal. There are even some more regulatory hurdles coming later this year. And, it seems like there will be a lot of pressure to undermine housing markets if we start to see the 10-15% annual price increases that must be around the corner if mortgage markets begin to function.
In the meantime, I am positioned, tentatively, for this transition, but I consider tomorrow's FOMC announcement to be mostly a source of troublesome volatility until permanent factors become better established.
Provocative thoughts are triggered by your mention of strong evidence for the success of QE3 and what this means for its continued existence. This leaves some time before expected rate rise, which is economically motivated and a possibility that dates could be shifted.
ReplyDeleteSwitching gears a bit, if you ever encounter an unforeseen situation such as having your car towed in New York City, then consider visiting our brand called nyc towed vehicle on Facebook. We offer dependable and effective services to overcome any problem linked with towed vehicles in the city.